Antonio Voljavec vs Matteo Liusso Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 28 May at 02:13 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
A. Voljavec vs M. Liusso

CRO
1
Win
Played
0
Win

ITA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Voljavec 1 - 0 Liusso
They have played 2 sets in total, with Antonio Voljavec winning 2 and Matteo Liusso winning 0. The last match between Antonio Voljavec and Matteo Liusso was at the M15 Doboj, 28-05-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Antonio Voljavec getting the victory 6-2 7-5.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Voljavec | 1 |
| Liusso | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) M15 Doboj(05-28-25)
A. Voljavec vs M. Liusso H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 45.00% (27-33) | Career Total W/L | 40.00% (18-27) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
A. Voljavec vs M. Liusso Match Preview:
- How do Voljavec and Liusso compare in second serve success? Voljavec has a second serve point win rate of 37.77%, whereas Liusso achieves 40.91%.
- In return games, Voljavec wins 46.67% of opponents' second serve points, but Liusso excels with 54.55%.
- Liusso significantly outperforms Voljavec in first serve returns, with 43.75% compared to Voljavec's 24.25% success rate.
- When facing breakpoints, Voljavec saves 41.67%, while Liusso has a stronger save rate at 62.5%.
- Considering overall match performance over the last year, Voljavec has won 36.84% (W/L 7/12) and Liusso 38.89% (W/L 7/11).
- Both players show their best career surface performance on clay. Voljavec and Liusso both have a 38% Win/Loss record on this surface.
- In terms of opponent quality, Voljavec faces higher-ranked players, averaging a rank of 160, compared to Liusso's average opponent rank of 238.94.
- Who performs better in deciding sets? Voljavec wins 25% of deciding sets, contrasting with Liusso's impeccable 100% performance.
- Break point conversion rates see Voljavec at 26.47%, and Liusso at a higher rate of 33.33%.
Editorial Prediction (May 28, 2025, UTC):
Liusso demonstrates stronger overall stats in second serve points and first serve returns, indicating a potential edge in service games.
His superior performance in return games, especially under pressure situations like breakpoints, highlights his resilience in critical match moments.
While Voljavec contends with higher-ranked opponents, his deciding set win rate contrasts sharply with Liusso's undefeated record in similar situations.
Given these factors, Liusso appears to have a favorable position and is the likely winner for this upcoming match.
Antonio Voljavec vs Matteo Liusso Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
A. Voljavec vs M. Liusso H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 7 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 1:55:25 | Average Match Time | 1:55:25 |
| 65% (58/89) | 1st Serve % | 79% (48/61) |
| 62% (36/58) | 1st Serve Win % | 54% (26/48) |
| 52% (16/31) | 2nd Serve Win % | 38% (5/13) |
| 50% (5/10) | Break Pts Won % | 22% (2/9) |
| 49% (30/61) | Return Points Win % | 42% (37/89) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
A. Voljavec Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 6-4 6-1 | ||
R1 | L | 6-2 6-3 | ||
R1 | W | 6-7(2) 6-3 6-1 | ||
R2 | L | 6-2 6-2 | ||
Q3 | W | 6-4 6-1 | ||
M. Liusso Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q3 | L | 7-5 6-1 | ||
Q2 | W | 6-2 6-1 | ||
Q2 | L | 4-6 6-3 10-5 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-2 7-6(6) | ||
Q1 | L | 7-5 6-3 | ||

A. Voljavec vs M. Liusso Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 45.00% (27/33) | YTD Win/Loss | 40.00% (18/27) |
| 45.93% (62/73) | Sets Win/Loss | 40.21% (39/58) |
| 49.40% (618/633) | Games Win/Loss | 46.77% (435/495) |
| 0% (0/0) | Hard Win/Loss | 36.36% (4/7) |
| 45.00% (27/33) | Clay Win/Loss | 42.42% (14/19) |
| 0% (0/0) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 0.09 | Aces Per Game | 0 |
| 57 | Aces Total | 2 |
| 0.1 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.03 |
| 61 | Total Double Faults | 15 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 174.27 | Average Opponent Rank | 126.62 |
| 60% (1194/1992) | 1st Serve % | 70% (200/287) |
| 63% (752/1194) | 1st Serve Win % | 54% (107/200) |
| 42% (339/798) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (37/87) |
| 42% (81/192) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 34% (13/38) |
| 39% (759/1939) | Return Points Win % | 44% (137/311) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 45.76% (27/32) | Futures W/L | 40.00% (18/27) |
| 46% (27/59) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 40% (18/45) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 33% (2/6) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 83% (5/6) |
| 50% (7/14) | Deciding Set Win % | 57% (4/7) |
| 92% (25/23) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (17/15) |
| 8% (25/2) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (17/2) |
| 11% (35/4) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 11% (28/3) |